From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterwhite v. PPG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 5, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-3576-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-3576-G (BN)

01-05-2021

WINSTON SATTERWHITE Plaintiff, v. PPG (PITTSBURG PLATE & GLASS), Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (the "FCR").

To the extent that the Plaintiff (1) can cure the deficiencies noted in the FCR and (2) believes venue is proper in this federal district and division, he may file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. His failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice and without prejudice to it being filed where venue may be proper.

SO ORDERED.

January 5, 2021.

/s/_________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Satterwhite v. PPG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 5, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-3576-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Satterwhite v. PPG

Case Details

Full title:WINSTON SATTERWHITE Plaintiff, v. PPG (PITTSBURG PLATE & GLASS), Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 5, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-3576-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2021)