From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterwhite v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jul 29, 2008
Case No. 1:06-cv-165 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cv-165.

July 29, 2008


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge William B. Carter filed his report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). [Court Doc. 32.] Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees [Court Doc. 23] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is AWARDED attorney's fees in the amount of $16,933.00.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Satterwhite v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jul 29, 2008
Case No. 1:06-cv-165 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Satterwhite v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA SATTERWHITE, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Jul 29, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cv-165 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Walsh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, Company

A remand to the plan administrator constitutes a substantial level of success on the merits. See Satterwhite…

Heyman v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co.

00 to $42,815.00. See Satterwhite v. Met. Life. Ins. Co., No. 1:06-cv-165, 2008 WL 2952473 (E.D. Tenn. July…