From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. Seifert

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-1024 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-1024

03-14-2024

MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. JAMES F. SEIFERT, Defendant.


ORDER

On November 30, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 2, 4.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 2), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's filing seeking to amend his complaint in case 1:23-cv-143 or filing a habeas petition under § 2254 on the proper forms.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. Seifert

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 14, 2024
1:23-cv-1024 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Satterfield v. Seifert

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. JAMES F. SEIFERT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-1024 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2024)