From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. Person Cnty. Courts

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 31, 2023
1:22-cv-958 (M.D.N.C. May. 31, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-958

05-31-2023

MARCUS A. SATTERFIELD, Petitioner, v. PERSON COUNTY COURTS, Respondent.


ORDER

On November 15, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation ("Recommendation") was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 2, 3.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636. Although Petitioner filed a pro se letter requesting the appointment of counsel, (Doc. 4), that letter raises no objections to the Recommendation.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted. In light of this order adopting the Recommendation and dismissing this action without prejudice, Petitioner's letter requesting the appointment of counsel will be denied as moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 2), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be filed, and is hereby, DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition on the proper forms, which corrects the defects of the current Petition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's letter requesting the appointment of counsel, (Doc. 4), is DENIED AS MOOT.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be filed contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. Person Cnty. Courts

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
May 31, 2023
1:22-cv-958 (M.D.N.C. May. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Satterfield v. Person Cnty. Courts

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS A. SATTERFIELD, Petitioner, v. PERSON COUNTY COURTS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: May 31, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-958 (M.D.N.C. May. 31, 2023)