From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. Person Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Dec 22, 2022
1:22CV1066 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

1:22CV1066

12-22-2022

MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD Plaintiff, v. PERSON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Joe L. Webster, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted a cover letter stating that he sought to file a lawsuit, that he was prevented from filing it, and that he seeks information on where or how to file it. To the extent Plaintiff seeks information on filing in the state courts, this Court has no control over or knowledge of that process and cannot provide legal advice in any event. Plaintiff must seek information from the state courts. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to file in this Court, the proper method for filing the claims he seeks to raise appears to be a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Therefore, the Court treated his filing as such an action. Nevertheless, the form of the Complaint is such that serious flaws make it impossible to further process the Complaint. The problems are:

1. The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed and signed by Plaintiff, to permit review.

2. The Complaint is not on forms prescribed for use by this Court, nor is the information requested by such forms and necessary to process the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A contained in Plaintiff's submission. See LR 7.1(d).

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects of the present Complaint. To further aid Plaintiff, the Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff new § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed In forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. Person Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Dec 22, 2022
1:22CV1066 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Satterfield v. Person Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD Plaintiff, v. PERSON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

1:22CV1066 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2022)