Opinion
24-6196
08-02-2024
Marcus Antonio Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 30, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:23-cv-01071-WO-JLW)
Marcus Antonio Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Antonio Satterfield appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Satterfield's civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Limiting our review to the issues raised in Satterfield's informal brief, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Satterfield v. Mccaddams, No. 1:23-cv-01071-WO-JLW (M.D. N.C. Feb. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED