From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. Manning

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1948
46 S.E.2d 104 (N.C. 1948)

Opinion

(Filed 30 January, 1948.)

APPEAL by certain of the defendants from Bone, J., at October Term, 1947, of DURHAM. Reversed.

Fuller, Reade Fuller, Basil M. Watkins, and James L. Newsom for plaintiffs, appellees.

Brawley Brawley, Egbert L. Haywood, and Victor S. Bryant for defendants, appellants.


This was an action by the plaintiffs as creditors of the estate of Sallie A. Rigsbee, deceased, to require the sale of certain real property of which it was alleged she died seized, to make assets to pay the debts of the estate. The defendants, Mrs. Zoa L. Haywood, Willis Briggs, guardian of Mary E. Middleton, R. H. Rigsbee and wife, Rosa L. Fulford and husband, Mattie T. Bitting, and The Life and Casualty Insurance Co. and Keeble, Trustee, demurred to the complaint for the reasons stated in the demurrer, and, from judgment overruling their demurrer, these defendants appealed.


In view of the opinion in Satterfield v. Manning, ante, 467, holding that the demurrer to the complaint in that action should have been sustained, and that thus the alleged rights of the plaintiffs as creditors of the estate of Sallie A. Rigsbee were not upheld, it follows that plaintiffs' proceeding as creditors against certain real estate of the decedent must fail.

For this reason, the judgment below must be

Reversed.

SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. Manning

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1948
46 S.E.2d 104 (N.C. 1948)
Case details for

Satterfield v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:F. G. SATTERFIELD, J. S. SATTERFIELD AND WALKER STONE, FORMERLY TRADING…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1948

Citations

46 S.E.2d 104 (N.C. 1948)
46 S.E.2d 104