From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterfield v. City of Englewood

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-6037 (FSH) (D.N.J. Apr. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-6037 (FSH).

April 22, 2008


ORDER


This matter coming before this Court upon Magistrate Judge Shwartz's March 31, 2008 Report and Recommendation recommending that "the United States District Judge dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37" as a result of Plaintiff's failure to respond to Court orders and failure to provide discovery; and

it appearing that neither party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation and that ten days have passed, see L. Civ. R. 72.1(c)(2); and

this Court having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, and good cause appearing;

IT IS on this 22nd day of April, 2008

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Shwartz's March 31, 2008 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; and it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that this case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Satterfield v. City of Englewood

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 22, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-6037 (FSH) (D.N.J. Apr. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Satterfield v. City of Englewood

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Apr 22, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-6037 (FSH) (D.N.J. Apr. 22, 2008)