From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satgunam v. Hackney, Grover, Hoover & Bean

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 10, 2015
SC: 151274 (Mich. Apr. 10, 2015)

Opinion

SC: 151274

04-10-2015

SHEAN SATGUNAM, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HACKNEY, GROVER, HOOVER & BEAN, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

151274 & (18) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, Justices COA: 323798
Ingham CC: 12-001194-NM

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 10, 2015

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Satgunam v. Hackney, Grover, Hoover & Bean

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 10, 2015
SC: 151274 (Mich. Apr. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Satgunam v. Hackney, Grover, Hoover & Bean

Case Details

Full title:SHEAN SATGUNAM, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HACKNEY, GROVER, HOOVER …

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 10, 2015

Citations

SC: 151274 (Mich. Apr. 10, 2015)