From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satahoo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 23, 2005
895 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-1048.

February 23, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Judge.

Philip Satahoo, a/k/a David Taylor, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before COPE, GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ.


We affirm the denial of the defendant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.


Summaries of

Satahoo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 23, 2005
895 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Satahoo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Philip SATAHOO, a/k/a David Taylor, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 23, 2005

Citations

895 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Morales v. State

We have held that a vindictive sentencing claim cannot be brought by a motion to correct illegal sentence…