From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Qingdao Hanspray New Material Tech. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 12, 2023
2:22-cv-01832-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01832-GMN-EJY

01-12-2023

SATA GmbH & Co. KG, a German corporation, Plaintiff, v. Qingdao Hanspray New Material Technology Co., Ltd., a Chinese company; Qingdao Hanbo Plastic Technology Co. Ltd., a Chinese company; and Hanspray Industries Holding Co., Ltd., a Chinese company, Defendants.

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC STEVEN A. CALOIARO Nevada Bar No. 12344 KEVIN D. EVERAGE Nevada Bar No. 15913 Attorneys for Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Steven A. Caloiaro Nevada Bar No. 12344 KEVIN D. EVERAGE Nevada Bar No. 15913 Attorneys for Plaintiff WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. F.Christopher Austin, Esq. (SBN 6559) R.Scott Weide, Esq. (SBN 5541) A.Gregory Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 14368) Attorneys for Defendants


DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC STEVEN A. CALOIARO Nevada Bar No. 12344 KEVIN D. EVERAGE Nevada Bar No. 15913 Attorneys for Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Steven A. Caloiaro Nevada Bar No. 12344 KEVIN D. EVERAGE Nevada Bar No. 15913 Attorneys for Plaintiff

WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. F.Christopher Austin, Esq. (SBN 6559) R.Scott Weide, Esq. (SBN 5541) A.Gregory Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 14368) Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 15] (SECOND REQUEST)

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG (“SATA”) and Defendants Qingdao Hanspray New Material Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hanbo Plastic Technology Co. Ltd., Hanspray Industries Holding Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Hanspray”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the deadline for Plaintiff to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12 (b)(6) [ECF No. 15] (currently due on or before January 12, 2023), shall be further extended by seven (7) days to January 19, 2023 due to unforeseen medical circumstances.

This is the second request to extend the briefing on this Motion. The briefing was previously extended by second (7) days. [ECF No. 17] This request is made in good faith and based on unexpected medical issues of the Plaintiff's counsel, and is not requested for any improper purpose or delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Qingdao Hanspray New Material Tech. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 12, 2023
2:22-cv-01832-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 12, 2023)
Case details for

SATA GmbH & Co. KG v. Qingdao Hanspray New Material Tech. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SATA GmbH & Co. KG, a German corporation, Plaintiff, v. Qingdao Hanspray…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 12, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01832-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 12, 2023)