From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SAS Med., P.C. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Oct 25, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2018-1135 K C

10-25-2019

SAS MEDICAL, P.C., as Assignee of Paola Dossa, Omar Morrison and Sebastian Piemonte, Respondent, v. TRAVELERS INS. CO., Appellant.

Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Erika E.E. Treco of counsel), for appellant. Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Erika E.E. Treco of counsel), for appellant.

Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services rendered to assignors Paola Dossa and Omar Morrison are granted.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services rendered to assignors Paola Dossa and Omar Morrison on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.

Defendant demonstrated that it had timely mailed initial and follow-up requests for verification (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v. Government Empls. Ins. Co. , 50 AD3d 1123 [2008] ) and that it had not received the requested verification. Thus, defendant demonstrated, prima facie, that the complaint insofar as it sought to recover for services rendered to Paola Dossa and Omar Morrison is premature (see Central Suffolk Hosp. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. , 24 AD3d 492, 493 [2005] ). As plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the branches of defendant's motion at issue, those branches of defendant's motion should have been granted.

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, and the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services rendered to assignors Paola Dossa and Omar Morrison are granted.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

SAS Med., P.C. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Oct 25, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

SAS Med., P.C. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAS Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Paola Dossa, Omar Morrison and Sebastian…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Oct 25, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51759
119 N.Y.S.3d 385