From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
May 22, 2018
547 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105550

05-22-2018

John SARVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Sarver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
May 22, 2018
547 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Sarver v. State

Case Details

Full title:John SARVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: May 22, 2018

Citations

547 S.W.3d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)