From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartoris v. Primecare Med. Ceo

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 2024
CIVIL 3:23-cv-640 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:23-cv-640

11-25-2024

EDWARD SARTORIS, Plaintiff v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL CEO THOMAS J. WEBER, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' motion (Doc. 73) for summary judgment, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and in opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 73) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Garry Haidle, Joseph McCoy, Gregory Armond, and Monroe County, and against Plaintiff.

2. The action against the John Doe Defendants is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.

4. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Sartoris v. Primecare Med. Ceo

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 2024
CIVIL 3:23-cv-640 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Sartoris v. Primecare Med. Ceo

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SARTORIS, Plaintiff v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL CEO THOMAS J. WEBER, et…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 25, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 3:23-cv-640 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2024)