Sartoris v. Haidle

Full title: EDWARD SARTORIS, Plaintiff v. WARDEN HAIDLE, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

CIVIL 3:21-cv-1646 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21-cv-1646

12-19-2022

EDWARD SARTORIS, Plaintiff v. WARDEN HAIDLE, et al., Defendants

ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 19^th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' motion (Doc. 34) to partially dismiss the amended complaint, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and in opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 34) is GRANTED.

2. The claims against Warden Haidle and Deputy Warden McCoy are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Warden Haidle and Deputy Warden McCoy as Defendants in this action.

3. The official capacity claims are DISMISSED.

4. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).