From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartor v. O'Malley

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 22, 2024
1:24-cv-01031-JDB-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 22, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-01031-JDB-cgc

03-22-2024

AARON SARTOR, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER REMANDING CASE TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

J. DANIEL BREEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Commissioner of Social Security has moved to reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and remand this action to the Commissioner. (Docket Entry 11.) Remand will expedite administrative review, ensure that the Commissioner can fully consider Plaintiff's claim, and may make judicial review unnecessary. Remand is appropriate under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which provides in relevant part:

The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.
See also Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Newkirk v. Shalala, 25 F.3d 316, 318 (6th Cir. 1994).

For the foregoing reasons, because the motion is unopposed, and pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), the decision of the ALJ is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sartor v. O'Malley

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 22, 2024
1:24-cv-01031-JDB-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Sartor v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:AARON SARTOR, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 22, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-01031-JDB-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 22, 2024)