From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartin v. McNair Law Firm, P.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 30, 2012
C/A No.: 3:12-cv-895-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No.: 3:12-cv-895-JFA

08-30-2012

Peter A.T. Sartin, Plaintiff, v. McNair Law Firm, P.A., Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the court on a joint request (ECF No. 37) that all of the dates in the current scheduling order be held in abeyance until the pending motion for summary judgment is decided. The court hereby grants the parties' request and stays the deadlines in the current scheduling order. If this case is not dismissed on summary judgment, then this court will issue a new scheduling order for the remainder of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

August 30, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sartin v. McNair Law Firm, P.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 30, 2012
C/A No.: 3:12-cv-895-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Sartin v. McNair Law Firm, P.A.

Case Details

Full title:Peter A.T. Sartin, Plaintiff, v. McNair Law Firm, P.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

C/A No.: 3:12-cv-895-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 30, 2012)