Sartain v. State

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Tanniehill

    389 So. 3d 1229 (Ala. Crim. App. 2023)

    The circuit court found similarly when granting Tanniehill relief, although it did not cite Williams in support of that finding.Instead, the circuit court relied on Sartain v. State, 345 So. 3d 693 (Ala. Crim. App. 2021), in which this Court recognized that a circuit court has no jurisdiction to "act" on an illegal split sentence by revoking the probationary portion of the sentence. Sartain is inapposite, however, because, at the time Tanniehill filed his petition, the circuit court had taken no action on his sentence.