From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarr v. Sinergia, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2022
22-CV-3610 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3610 (VEC)

12-06-2022

ADAM SARR, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and the Class, Plaintiff, v. SINERGIA, INC. and DONALD LASH, Defendants.


ORDER

VALERIE CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS on December 2, 2022, the parties submitted their proposed notice and consent form, as well as a letter outlining the parties' remaining disputes regarding the proposed notice and consent form, Dkt. 42; and

WHEREAS Defendants complained in that letter about Plaintiff's counsel approaching Defendants' employees and former employees but did not provide any authority for their request that Plaintiff be precluded from approaching such individuals, id.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court would approve a proposed notice and consent form that includes the language contained in the redlined notice and consent form that is attached as an exhibit to this Order. The parties must submit the revised notice and consent form by Thursday, December 8, 2022.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court approves Defendants' proposed language for text and email communications accompanying the proposed notice and consent form, as any such communications are not official correspondence from this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Defendants want the Court to preclude contact between Plaintiff's counsel and putative members of the proposed collective, they must provide legal authority for the Court doing so.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sarr v. Sinergia, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2022
22-CV-3610 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Sarr v. Sinergia, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM SARR, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and the…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3610 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022)