From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarpy v. Pulido

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
ED CV 12-426-GAF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion


HALBERT DEAN SARPY, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER PULIDO, et al., Defendants. No. ED CV 12-426-GAF (SP). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 11, 2013.

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEES, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen days of this Order.


Summaries of

Sarpy v. Pulido

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
ED CV 12-426-GAF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Sarpy v. Pulido

Case Details

Full title:HALBERT DEAN SARPY, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER PULIDO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

ED CV 12-426-GAF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)