From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarnowski v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jul 8, 2022
No. 83809-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 8, 2022)

Opinion

83809-COA

07-08-2022

TREVOR JAY SARNOWSKI, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Gibbons C.J.

Trevor Jay Sarnowski appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed on October 6, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

In his motion, Sarnowski claimed the district court was without jurisdiction to impose any sentence because NRS 171.010 was improperly amended without legislative authority. A motion to correct an illegal sentence may only challenge the facial legality of the sentence: either the district court was without jurisdiction to impose a sentence or the sentence was imposed in excess of the statutory maximum. Edwards v. Slate, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996).

Sarnowski's claim did not implicate the district court's jurisdiction. See Nev. Const, art. 6, § 6(1); United States u. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 (2002) ("[T]he term jurisdiction means . . . the courts' statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate the case." (internal quotation marks omitted)). Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err by denying Sarnowski's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Tao J., Bulla J.

Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge


Summaries of

Sarnowski v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jul 8, 2022
No. 83809-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Sarnowski v. State

Case Details

Full title:TREVOR JAY SARNOWSKI, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Jul 8, 2022

Citations

No. 83809-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 8, 2022)