From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarnowski v. Securitas Sec. Servs. U.S.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO)

06-15-2022

JOSEPH SARNOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., Defendant.


ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (DOC. 18)

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties have stipulated to the action, including all claims and counterclaims, being dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. 18.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sarnowski v. Securitas Sec. Servs. U.S.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Sarnowski v. Securitas Sec. Servs. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SARNOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)