From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarmiento v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 28, 2015
465 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

2015-07-28

Carlos Sarmiento, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO for appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.


APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLINTON COUNTY, The Honorable Darin L. Adkins, Judge
Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO for appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.
BEFORE: DIVISION THREE: KAREN KING MITCHELL, PRESIDING JUDGE, LISA WHITE HARDWICK AND ANTHONY REX GABBERT, JUDGES

Order


Per Curiam

Carlos Sarmiento appeals the circuit court's order denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing, following his conviction for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. Sarmiento contends he was entitled to postconviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate and obtain evidence showing that someone else may have committed the crimes. Upon a thorough review of the record and the briefs, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b)


Summaries of

Sarmiento v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 28, 2015
465 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Sarmiento v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carlos Sarmiento, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

465 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)