From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarkis v. Heimburger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 1, 2000
24 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED75523.

OPINION FILED: February 1, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE MICHAEL B. CALVIN, JUDGE.

Jeffrey J. Lowe, 701 Market St., Suite 8000, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Richard A. Ahrens, 500 N. Broadway, Suite 2000, St. Louis, MO 63102, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.



ORDER


Anthony Sarkis, et al., ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's dismissal of their petition against Roy Heimburger, et al., ("Defendants") for lack of standing.

We find that no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).


Summaries of

Sarkis v. Heimburger

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Feb 1, 2000
24 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Sarkis v. Heimburger

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SARKIS, ET AL., APPELLANTS, vs. ROY R. HEIMBURGER, ET AL.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Feb 1, 2000

Citations

24 S.W.3d 738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Missouri v. Nixon

On February 1, 2000, the Eastern District of this court affirmed that dismissal in an unpublished opinion.…