From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarkar v. McCallin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 17, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02704-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02704-WDM-MJW

08-17-2011

PURENDU SARKAR, Plaintiff, v. NANCY MCCALLIN, etc., et al., Defendants.


Senior District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ADD COLLECTION FEE TO JUDGMENT

On August 16, 2011, Machol & Johannes, LLC, filed a motion to add a collection fee to judgment, referring to Bankruptcy F.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2) [sic]. The motion is based on a Colorado statute which has no relevance to this case brought under federal law. It is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

BY THE COURT:

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Sarkar v. McCallin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 17, 2011
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02704-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Sarkar v. McCallin

Case Details

Full title:PURENDU SARKAR, Plaintiff, v. NANCY MCCALLIN, etc., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02704-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 17, 2011)