From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarique v. Bank of America, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03641-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-03641-JCS

10-18-2011

SARIQUE, ELGIN AND DAISY, individuals, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (A.K.A. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS), a Corporation, NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION, a Corporation; PRLAP INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

BRYAN CAVE LLP Andrea Hicks, California Bar No. 219836 BRYAN CAVE LLP Robert E. Boone III, California Bar No. 132780 Attorneys for Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC.


BRYAN CAVE LLP

Andrea Hicks, California Bar No. 219836

BRYAN CAVE LLP

Robert E. Boone III, California Bar No. 132780

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC.

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


[L.R. 6-1 (a)]

STIPULATION

Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and PRLAP, Inc. ("Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Elgin Sarique and Daisy Sarique ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and PRLAP, Inc. removed this matter from Santa Clara County Superior Court on July 25, 2011.

2. The parties previously stipulated to two extensions for Defendants to respond to the Complaint 15 days to August 16, 2011 and then 60 days to October 17, 2011.

3. In order to continue the current settlement discussions, reduce cost of litigation for both parties, and potentially unburden the Court's docket, Plaintiffs grant Defendants an extension to respond to their Complaint. Thus, instead of responding to the Complaint on October 17, 2011, the parties agree that Defendants' time to file and serve their response to the Complaint is extended 90 days.

4. The stipulation will not result in prejudice to any party and its impact on judicial proceedings is not expected to be significant.

5. Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver of any arguments or defenses that Defendants or Plaintiffs may wish to assert in their pleadings, all of which are expressly reserved.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH GRAHAM

Kenneth R. Graham

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ELGIN SARIQUE and DAISY SARIQUE

BRYAN CAVE LLP

Robert E. Boone

Andrea M. Hicks

Andrea M. Hicks

Attorneys for Defendants

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiffs ELGIN SARIQUE and DAISY SARIQUE and Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC. and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended 90 days from October 17, 2011.

Judge Joseph C. Spero

United States District Court

Northern District of California


Summaries of

Sarique v. Bank of America, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03641-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Sarique v. Bank of America, NA

Case Details

Full title:SARIQUE, ELGIN AND DAISY, individuals, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-03641-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)