Opinion
2:23-cv-10922-VBF-SHK
09-23-2024
TOMAS SARINANA, JR., Petitioner, v. ROBERT LUNA, et al., Respondents.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, United States District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. However, Petitioner Tomas Sarinana, Jr. (“Petitioner”), filed two identical motions “To Award Writ Or Direct Respondent A [sic] Order to Show Cause Why Th[e] Writ Should Not Be Granted” (“Motions”) after the R&R was issued. See Electronic Case Filing Numbers (“ECF Nos.”) 13, 14, Mots. The Motions, however, do not address the findings and recommendations in the R&R. Thus, the Court does not construe the Motions as objections to the R&R. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1) The Petition is DENIED;
2) The Motions [ECF Nos. 13, 14] are DENIED as moot; and
3) Judgment be entered DISMISSING this action without prejudice.