From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarik v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 12, 2024
Civil Action 23-cv-5043 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-cv-5043

08-12-2024

RATTANAK M. SARIK, Petitioner v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents


ORDER

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2024, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), the response to the Petition (ECF No. 8), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (ECF No. 9), and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. No certificate of appealability shall issue because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Sarik v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 12, 2024
Civil Action 23-cv-5043 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Sarik v. McGinley

Case Details

Full title:RATTANAK M. SARIK, Petitioner v. THOMAS MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 12, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-cv-5043 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2024)