From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarelas v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 6, 1943
317 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,996. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 6, 1943

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.2instructions, prejudicial and harmless error. On review controverted instructions should be set out in full in the brief and argument, and reference by number to another source for their consideration condemned; and instructions which stated abstract legal propositions and did not advise the jury of the application of the instructions to the evidence were properly refused.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. DANIEL P. TRUDE, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in third division, first district, this court at October term, 1941.

Alfred M. Loeser and Peter S. Sarelas, for appellant;

Leonard Koplin, of counsel;

Kirkland, Fleming, Green, Martin Ellis, for certain appellee;

William H. Symmes, David Jaeker, Charles M. Rush and John M. O'Connor, Jr., of counsel;

Henry B. Rothenberg, for certain other appellee; Henry B. Rothenberg, of counsel.


ON REHEARING.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed January 6, 1943.


Summaries of

Sarelas v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jan 6, 1943
317 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
Case details for

Sarelas v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:Kalliope Sarelas, Appellant, v. Samuel Meyer and The Hoover Company…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jan 6, 1943

Citations

317 Ill. App. 382 (Ill. App. Ct. 1943)
46 N.E.2d 140

Citing Cases

Lynch v. Board of Education

( Brunnworth v. Kerens Coal Co. (1913), 260 Ill. 202, 216-17; Ney v. Yellow Cab Co. (1954), 2 Ill.2d 74, 79.)…