From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 432 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 641.

Mr. Sol Phillips Perlman, for the respondent.

Mr. Aaron V. Dawes, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 432 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver

Case Details

Full title:THE SARCO COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, respondent, v. ALTA R. GULLIVER, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 432 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Sonotone Corp. v. Ellis

It is settled that a restrictive covenant by an employee not to compete, ancillary to his contract of…

Silbros, Inc., v. Solomon

Neither modern public policy nor the judicial decisions of recent years have disapproved of contracts in…