From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarasota, Inc. v. Finkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 2004
7 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3318.

Decided May 20, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered April 11, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to enter a default judgment within one year pursuant to CPLR 3215(c), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.

Arnold W. Blatt, New City, for appellants. Craner, Satkin Scheer, P.A., Scotch Plains, N.J. (John A. Craner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner, Gonzalez, JJ.


In view of plaintiff's unexplained failure to seek a default judgment in the nine years that have elapsed since defendants' default, defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiff's failure to seek entry of the judgment within one year after the default should have been granted (CPLR 3215[c]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Sarasota, Inc. v. Finkel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 20, 2004
7 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Sarasota, Inc. v. Finkel

Case Details

Full title:SARASOTA, INC., ETC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TINA FINKEL, A/K/A TINA F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 20, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 482