From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sapp v. Propeller Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 2004
5 A.D.3d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Summary

stating an "actual eviction occurs when a landlord wrongfully ousts a tenant"

Summary of this case from Robert B. Jetter, M.D., PLLC v. 737 Park Ave. Acquisition LLC

Opinion

3084.

Decided March 9, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 27, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Thomas C. Lambert, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce H. Wiener and Nat J. Azznara, for Defendants-Respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Gonzalez, JJ.


An actual eviction occurs when a landlord wrongfully ousts a tenant from physical possession of the leased premises ( Barash v. Pennsylvania Terminal Real Estate Corp., 26 N.Y.2d 77, 82-83). Although plaintiff tenants demonstrated that, for some unspecified period following a fire, defendant landlords padlocked the building in which plaintiffs had leased premises, there are triable issues of fact as to whether the premises in question were usable at the time plaintiffs were locked out and whether defendants' action had a lawful basis.

This question is not resolved by the prior finding of the Civil Court in a holdover proceeding brought by defendant Propeller against another tenant of the same building, that the fire damage was insufficient to provide a reasonable basis for Propeller's decision to demolish or rebuild the building. Invocation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inappropriate because there was no identity of issue ( see Schwartz v. Public Adm'r. of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65, 71). Unlike the issue before the Civil Court, the question before the motion court was whether, in the weeks immediately following the fire, defendants had a lawful basis for denying plaintiffs unrestricted entry into the building.

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Sapp v. Propeller Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 2004
5 A.D.3d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

stating an "actual eviction occurs when a landlord wrongfully ousts a tenant"

Summary of this case from Robert B. Jetter, M.D., PLLC v. 737 Park Ave. Acquisition LLC
Case details for

Sapp v. Propeller Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY SAPP, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE PROPELLER COMPANY LLC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 515

Citing Cases

Whaling Willie's Roadhouse Grill, Inc. v. Sea Gulls Partners, Inc.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, granting the…

Universal Communications Network, Inc. v. 229 West 28th Owner, LLC

Here, the claims asserted are also barred by the express language of the lease between the parties. Plaintiff…