Sapien v. State

Full title: Andrew Sapien, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

478 S.W.3d 447 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77524

10-06-2015

Andrew Sapien, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Per Curiam

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Victor C. Howard, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Andrew Sapien appeals from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 postconviction motion.For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).