From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saperston v. Holdaway

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 19, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1020 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-19

In the Matter of Willard SAPERSTON, Appellant, v. Heather HOLDAWAY, Respondent.

Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Michael B. Powers of counsel), for appellant. Peter C. Lomtevas, Esq., P.C., Brooklyn (Peter C. Lomtevas of counsel), for respondent.


Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Michael B. Powers of counsel), for appellant. Peter C. Lomtevas, Esq., P.C., Brooklyn (Peter C. Lomtevas of counsel), for respondent.
Bouvier Partnership, LLP, Buffalo (Emilio L. Colaiacovo of counsel), Attorney for the Child.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law within the meaning of CPLR 5601(a).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur. Judge RIVERA took no part.


Summaries of

Saperston v. Holdaway

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 19, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1020 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Saperston v. Holdaway

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Willard SAPERSTON, Appellant, v. Heather HOLDAWAY…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1020 (N.Y. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1020
961 N.Y.S.2d 828
985 N.E.2d 423

Citing Cases

Wojciulewicz v. McCauley

Contrary to the father's contention, where, as here, the court is making an initial custody determination,…

Varner v. Glass

As there had been no prior award of custody, strict application of those factors was not required (see…