From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sapeg v. Steadham

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 25, 2021
3:18cv2114/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2021)

Opinion

3:18cv2114/LAC/EMT

01-25-2021

JUAN JOSE SAPEG, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT T. STEADHAM, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 27, 2020, the court entered an order directing Plaintiff to submit one identical and complete copy of the amended complaint within thirty days so that service of process could be effected (ECF No. 26). After that deadline passed and Plaintiff had failed to comply, the undersigned entered an order directing Plaintiff to show cause within thirty days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (ECF No. 27). The undersigned advised that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not responded to the show cause order.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that:

1. This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute.

2. The clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 25 th day of January 2021.


Summaries of

Sapeg v. Steadham

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 25, 2021
3:18cv2114/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Sapeg v. Steadham

Case Details

Full title:JUAN JOSE SAPEG, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT T. STEADHAM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jan 25, 2021

Citations

3:18cv2114/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2021)