From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sapeg v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2020
295 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-898

05-22-2020

Juan JOSE SAPEG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without further discussion, the postconviction court's denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. See Brooks v. State , 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (holding that for motions filed under rule 3.800(a), any error in the scoresheet is harmless if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet). We remand, however, for the court to enter a corrected scoresheet to show that Appellant's conviction on count one was for a level eight offense and that his conviction on count nine was for a level four offense.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

LAMBERT, GROSSHANS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sapeg v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 22, 2020
295 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Sapeg v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUAN JOSE SAPEG, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

295 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)