Opinion
Case No. 5D20-898
05-22-2020
Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
Juan Jose Sapeg, Sanford, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, without further discussion, the postconviction court's denial of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. See Brooks v. State , 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (holding that for motions filed under rule 3.800(a), any error in the scoresheet is harmless if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet). We remand, however, for the court to enter a corrected scoresheet to show that Appellant's conviction on count one was for a level eight offense and that his conviction on count nine was for a level four offense.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
LAMBERT, GROSSHANS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.