From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sapa Extrusions, Inc. v. Dep't of Treasury

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 6, 2016
884 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 153265 153266 153267 153268 153269 153270 153271 153272 153273 153274 153275 153276 153277 153278 153279. COA Nos. 326414 326415 326512 326513 326585 326586 326732 326733 326818 327725 327880 327962 327963 328231.

09-06-2016

SAPA EXTRUSIONS, INC., formerly known as Alcoa Extrusions, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant–Appellee. Ball Corporation, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. EMC corporation, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. EMC corporation, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Deluxe Financial Services, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Schwan's Home Service, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Monster Beverage Corporation, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Monster Beverage Corporation, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee. Schwan's Home Service, Inc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Department of Treasury, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J.

I would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissenting statement in Gillette Commercial Operations North America v. Dep't of Treasury, 499 Mich. 960, 961–962, 880 N.W.2d 230 (2016).

VIVIANO, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.


Summaries of

Sapa Extrusions, Inc. v. Dep't of Treasury

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 6, 2016
884 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Sapa Extrusions, Inc. v. Dep't of Treasury

Case Details

Full title:SAPA EXTRUSIONS, INC., formerly known as Alcoa Extrusions, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 6, 2016

Citations

884 N.W.2d 268 (Mich. 2016)