From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santoyo v. Tatum

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
2:23-CV-2481-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-2481-TLN-DMC-P

12-05-2023

JORGE AGUILAR SANTOYO, Plaintiff, v. TATUM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The request to proceed in forma pauperis will, therefore, granted. The sufficiency of Plaintiff's complaint and service thereof will be addressed by separate order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is granted.


Summaries of

Santoyo v. Tatum

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
2:23-CV-2481-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Santoyo v. Tatum

Case Details

Full title:JORGE AGUILAR SANTOYO, Plaintiff, v. TATUM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-2481-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)