From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Work 88, Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 23, 2023
No. A-2073-21 (App. Div. Mar. 23, 2023)

Opinion

A-2073-21

03-23-2023

LOUISE SANTOS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WORK 88, INC., GOLDEN DRAGON REALTY, INC., WOK 88, INC., EP CHINA HOUSE, CHINA HOUSE, BAGEL BASE, UTICA FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY, and KB INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Respondents, and THE NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

Capehart &Scatchard, PA, attorneys for appellant (Christopher J. Hoare and Laura M. Danks, on the briefs). Litvak &Trifiolis, PC, attorneys for respondents Golden Dragon Realty, Inc. and KB Insurance Company (Thomas W. Griffin, on the brief).


This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted February 7, 2023

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-0419-19.

Capehart &Scatchard, PA, attorneys for appellant (Christopher J. Hoare and Laura M. Danks, on the briefs).

Litvak &Trifiolis, PC, attorneys for respondents Golden Dragon Realty, Inc. and KB Insurance Company (Thomas W. Griffin, on the brief).

Before Judges Rose and Gummer.

PER CURIAM

We have been advised that this matter has been amicably resolved and the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Santos v. Work 88, Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 23, 2023
No. A-2073-21 (App. Div. Mar. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Santos v. Work 88, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE SANTOS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WORK 88, INC., GOLDEN DRAGON…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 23, 2023

Citations

No. A-2073-21 (App. Div. Mar. 23, 2023)