From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Urs Energy & Constr. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
Case No. 6:14-cv-938-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:14-cv-938-Orl-22GJK

07-14-2015

ALEXANDRA SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. URS ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION INC., Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:

MOTION: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUANTIFY ATTORNEYS' FEE AWARD (Doc. No. 33)

FILED: JUNE 10, 2015

THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED.

On May 13, 2015, the Court entered an order granting URS Energy and Construction Inc.'s (the "Defendant") motion to compel (Doc. No. 29) against Alexandra Santos (the "Plaintiff"). Doc. No. 31. In the order, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court awarded Defendant its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in making the motion, and directed Defendant to file a motion to quantify the attorneys' fees if the parties were unable to resolve the issue of quantification. Doc. No. 31 at 2-3. On June 10, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion to Quantify Attorneys' Fee Award (the "Motion"). Doc. No. 33. In the Motion, Defendant requests that the Court enter an order awarding Defendant $874.35 in reasonable attorneys' fees against the Plaintiff. Doc. No. 33 at 3-4.

Defendant attaches a detailed affidavit and a time sheet to the Motion. Doc. No. 33-5 at 1-4, 7, 11. The chart below reflects the individual who performed each task, the requested hourly rate, the time expended, a discount of 10%, and the total amount of attorneys' fees requested:

Attorney

Rate

Hours Worked

Total

Joanne B. Lambert

$435.00

0.9

$391.50

Jessica D. Anderson

$290.00

2.0

$580.00

Subtotal

$971.50

10% Discount

-$97.15

TOTAL

$874.35

Id. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion and, therefore, the Motion is unopposed. See Doc. No. 23 at 5 ("Where no memorandum in opposition has been filed, the Court routinely grants the motion as unopposed.").

The Court has carefully reviewed the hourly rates requested, time expended, and the discount applied in the Motion and finds that it is reasonable. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court:

1. GRANT the Motion (Doc. No. 33); and

2. Enter a separate judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff in the amount of $874.35.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send a copy of this report and recommendation to Plaintiff by both Certified and Regular U.S. Mail.

A party failing to file written objection to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations within fourteen (14) days of issuance of the Report and Recommendation, waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions.

RECOMMENDED in Orlando, Florida on July 14, 2015

/s/_________

GREGORY J. KELLY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties


Summaries of

Santos v. Urs Energy & Constr. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
Case No. 6:14-cv-938-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Santos v. Urs Energy & Constr. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDRA SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. URS ENERGY AND CONSTRUCTION INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:14-cv-938-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mach. & Parts Export, LLC

Additionally, the Motion is unopposed, and "[w]here no memorandum in opposition has been filed, the Court…