Santos v. Tucker

Full title: CLARENCE J. SANTOS, JR., Plaintiff, v. QUINTON TUCKER, et. al, Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 21, 2008

Civil No. 07-6028 (FSH) (D.N.J. Feb. 21, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-6028 (FSH).

February 21, 2008

ORDER

FAITH HOCHBERG, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and upon the Court's obligation to review jurisdiction in this case; and

it appearing that on December 26, 2007, the Court ordered the parties to provide "a good faith statement of the dollar amount in controversy, with the basis for calculating damages and all supporting documentation. If any component of the damages claimed cannot be stated with precision at this time, so indicate in the filing and state what information is needed to specify the computation of damages and the date upon which such information can be supplied." and

it appearing that none of the parties responded to this Order;

IT IS on this 21^st day of February, 2008,

ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall provide a good faith statement of the dollar amount in controversy with the basis for calculating damages and all supporting documentation. If any component of damages claimed cannot be stated with precision at this time, plaintiff may so indicate in the filing and state what information is needed to specify the computation of damages at the date upon which such information can be supplied. This statement of the amount in controversy shall be provided no later than February 27, 2008; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants shall also provide a good faith statement of the dollar amount in controversy with their opposition papers to the Plaintiff's Motion to Remand no later than March 3, 2008; and it is further

ORDERED that failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions.