From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-313 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-313 Erie.

May 23, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 21, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on May 3, 2006 [Doc. No. 21], recommended that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the matter and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 3, 2006 [Doc. No. 21], is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Santos v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 23, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-313 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Santos v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS J. SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES F. SHERMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-313 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 23, 2006)