From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 2, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv4/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv4/RV/EMT.

July 2, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 22, 2007. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 7) is DENIED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Santos v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 2, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv4/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 2, 2007)
Case details for

Santos v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO SANTOS, Petitioner, v. SCOTT P. FISHER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv4/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 2, 2007)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Middlebrooks

Since § 3585(b) expressly precludes the BOP from granting credit for time "credited against another…