From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Baker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-01 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-01 Erie.

December 4, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 3, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24], filed on November 13, 2006, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] be granted, and that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 19 be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motions and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 19] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on November 13, 2006 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Santos v. Baker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 4, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-01 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Santos v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:LUIS SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARK BAKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 4, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-01 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2006)