From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santoro v. Star and Crescent Milling Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

April, 1935.


Order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion for a bill of particulars modified by providing that plaintiffs be also required to furnish, as to each cause of action, particulars as to items numbered 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 15 of the notice, except that plaintiffs shall not be required to furnish copies of agreements with their customers, or copies of bills and invoices of such customers, or copies of credits issued to them. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant; the particulars to be served within twenty days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Santoro v. Star and Crescent Milling Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Santoro v. Star and Crescent Milling Company

Case Details

Full title:GASPARE SANTORO and Others, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Kosiorek v. Hodgkinson

Plaintiff, having alleged special damage in his complaint, cannot withhold the names and addresses of the…

Hirsch v. Harrison Factors Corporation

Said subdivision (a) of item 14 requires plaintiff to set forth the names and addresses of her employees, but…