From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santomauro v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 22, 2021
165 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2021)

Opinion

2021-0997

12-22-2021

SANTOMAURO v. MCLAUGHLIN


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Prohibition. On respondent's motion to dismiss. Motion denied. Sua sponte, claims asserted in relator's individual capacity and in his capacity as manager of SUMSS Property Management, L.L.C., dismissed and alternative writ granted as to claim asserted in relator's coexecutor capacity. The following schedule is set for the presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent's brief. The parties shall address only the prohibition claim that relator asserts in his capacity as coexecutor.

O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Santomauro v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 22, 2021
165 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2021)
Case details for

Santomauro v. McLaughlin

Case Details

Full title:SANTOMAURO v. MCLAUGHLIN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

165 Ohio St. 3d 1487 (Ohio 2021)
178 N.E.3d 520

Citing Cases

Santomauro v. McLaughlin

B. These two actions {¶ 11} In August 2021, Christopher filed a complaint for a writ of prohibition in this…