From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 12, 2023
2:23-cv-00186 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00186

12-12-2023

PHYLLIS SANTISTEVAN-SULLIVAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED, and AVTECHTYEE, INC., Defendants.


NOTED FOR HEARING: DECEMBER 12, 2023

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL WRITTEN DISCOVERY RESPONSES

Tana Lin United States District Judge

This matter came before the Court on Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Permission to File an Overlength Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Written Discovery Responses. Having considered the motion, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion, ORDERS that Defendants may have a 700-word extension of the word count limit in order to make their full response in opposition to Plaintiff's motion to compel written discovery responses, and that in accordance with LCR 7(f)(4), Plaintiff may have an equivalent 350-word extension on reply.

DONE IN OPEN COURT this 12th day of December 2023.


Summaries of

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 12, 2023
2:23-cv-00186 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS SANTISTEVAN-SULLIVAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TRANSDIGM GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 12, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00186 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 12, 2023)