From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 3, 2023
2:23-cv-00186-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00186-TL

03-03-2023

PHYLLIS SANTISTEVAN-SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED et al., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable Tana Lin, United States District Judge:

(1) On March 2, 2023, Defendants filed an unopposed motion to extend their respective deadlines to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Dkt. No. 9. Defendants note that Plaintiff approved the requested deadline extensions. Id. at ¶ 6.
(2) Pursuant to Section II.G. of Judge Lin's Standing Order for All Civil Cases, the Court therefore orders the Clerk to reset Defendant AvtechTyee's deadline to file an Answer to March 31, 2023, and Defendant TransDigm's deadline to file an Answer to April 3, 2023.

Defendants received Plaintiff's consent to extend the deadlines on February 27, 2023, but they did not file the motion until one day before Defendant AvtechTyee's Answer deadline. The Court reminds the Parties that motions for extension should be filed at least three (3) business days in advance of the expiration of the relevant deadline.


Summaries of

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 3, 2023
2:23-cv-00186-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Santistevan-Sullivan v. TransDigm Grp.

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS SANTISTEVAN-SULLIVAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 3, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00186-TL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2023)