From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santini v. Farris

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 18, 2022
No. 21-13045 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

21-13045

03-18-2022

JOSH R. SANTINI, Plaintiff, v. KIM FARRIS, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is the report issued on February 15, 2022 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The plaintiff's failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Santini v. Farris

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 18, 2022
No. 21-13045 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Santini v. Farris

Case Details

Full title:JOSH R. SANTINI, Plaintiff, v. KIM FARRIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

No. 21-13045 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2022)