From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santillan v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 30, 2016
No. ED CV 13-0734-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)

Opinion

No. ED CV 13-0734-JGB (DFM)

06-30-2016

CEASAR SANTILLAN, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH DAVIS et al., Defendant.


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. /// /// ///

2. Plaintiff's motion to strike is denied.

3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part.

4. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference claim is dismissed with prejudice.

5. Plaintiff's state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice.

6. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this case accordingly. Dated: June 30, 2016

/s/_________

JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Santillan v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 30, 2016
No. ED CV 13-0734-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Santillan v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:CEASAR SANTILLAN, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH DAVIS et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 30, 2016

Citations

No. ED CV 13-0734-JGB (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2016)